DEVICE CLASSES A device class is a scheme where user devices plugged into Energenie product, can be referred to as objects within a user application. It is a way of abstracting the on-air radio interface and Energenie device specifics from a user application, such that the user can code 'in the land of their devices'. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIREMENTS 1. EXPRESSIVE: To be able to write expressive and compact applications, that talk in the vocabulary of physical devices. a. All known Energenie devices to be modelled as classes inside a device database, and the capabilities and operations on those devices pre-written so they can be reused by a user application. b. An easy way for users to map energenie device intents to user device intents (such as by wrapping custom object vocabulary around the standard energenie device vocabulary) - e.g. room.heat() rather than plug.on() e.g. first level device names such as my_radiator or my_plug, or second level device names such as bedroom_radiator and kitchen_kettle (things plugged into devices) This will hide the detail of how messages get encoded and transported, and allows users to focus ore on the intents of the application, rather than the implementation details. 2. NAME REGISTRY: To be able to build a local registry of devices and their configurations, and refer to devices by name inside the application. a. to be configurable by learning (e.g. listen for messages such as a join message, and add the device to the registry) b. to be configurable by hand (e.g. hand entering the sensor id of a known device into the registry) c. to automatically build variables for the user program from the registry, so that users don't have to bother with lots of wiring up code every time their app starts. d. this registry must be persistable, e.g. save and restore to a disk file, so that on application startup, the device database is automatically loaded and objects created. e. the registry can be queried, such as 'find me all devices that are of type x' or 'find me all devices in location kitchen'. 3. INTENTS: To be able to command and query devices in a way that represents meaningful device-based intents (such as tv.on() and tv.get_power()) a. received data values to be cached for deferred query, such as get_power() b. the last receipt time of data from a transmitting device to be known c. the next expected receipt time of data from a transmitting device to be known d. the last known state of a transmitting device to be known (e.g. switch state both by commanded state and retrieved state) 4. AGNOSTIC: To be able to refer to user devices in an Energenie device agnostic way. e.g. it doesn't matter if the TV is plugged into a green button device, or a MiHome device. It is always tv.on() in the code. 5. LEARN/DISCOVER: To be able to instigate and manage learn mode from within an app a. To send specific commands to green button devices so they can learn the pattern b. To sniff for any messages from MiHome devices and capture them for later analysis and turning into device objects c. To process MiHome join requests, and send MiHome join acks 6. ABSTRACTED RADIO: To completely hide the user from the on-air radio interface a. choosing the correct radio frequency and modulation automatically b. choosing the correct physical layer configuration automatically, such as message repeats for certain devices Not as part of this work, but this should at least be enabled by the design 7. PERFORMING: To be able to build a well performing system with very few message collisions and message losses a. by dynamically learning report patterns of MiHome devices b. by intelligently deferring and schedulling transmit messages to avoid transmit slots of reporting devices c. to query device characteristics such as modulation scheme and msg repeats. also to estimate the transmit time of a particular message to help with message scheduling. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESIGN Devices.py to have a device class for each supported Energenie product. These classes to define the operations on that device, such as on() off() get_power(). Radio interface configuration parameters to be associated with each device class, such as the modulation scheme and message repeat requirements. commands modelled by function calls such as turn_on() commanded state? (did we ask it to be on, when did we ask?) reported state? (did it tell us it is on, when did we learn it?) overall device state can this device receive commands? can this device transmit reports? have we seen this device this run? when did we last hear from it? when did we last talk to it? when do we expect to next hear from it? common device features it's manufacturer id it's product id it's sensor id yet unmodelled devices still to be usable to some degree for MiHome devices, a proxy class generated dynamically based on received message parameters. e.g. if it reports a TEMPERATURE field, then there should be an automatic get_temperature() method generated. an incoming message callback this already knows it is for the device, but it is up to the device to decode and action an outgoing message sender to be knitted to the on air interface proxy, but no radio handler code in the device class or instance. TODO possibly add callbacks such as when_turned_on() when_turned_off() etc. Where do unknown incoming messages get routed to? Need to at least log them somewhere. Although they won't necessarily route to a device class. But useful for learning semantics. Perhaps there is a single 'UnknownDevice' that is just a Device() base class, that captures all of these messages? But there might be multiple devices, so perhaps we could generate UnknownDevice instances (optionally) when we receive messages from something that we don't know what it is yet? (do we need to know what our last sent request is, vs last known reported state? e.g. if we have sent a request but not heard a response yet, this means we think we asked it to turn on, but we don't yet know if it has done that. Some devices can't report back, but some can, so it would be nice to have a four stage state machine for on/off) (note, would be good to be able to persist the last message received on disk, so that when code restarts, it knows the last send/receive time that was last processed. i.e. a resumable state machine persisted to disk) (note, a message scheduler if inserted in the middle, would do callbacks to say that the request has been processed, so timestamps can be updated. Also same scheduler could handle retries perhaps, if the device is tx and rx, then when you send a switch change, it would normally report back that the switch had changed, so if you don't get it, or if it is in the wrong state, could retry a send again until it changes) (note, inner variables might have two versions for some devices, the requested value and the confirmed value. If they are different, it means might still be waiting for a reply, so can't guarantee the command was received yet) Device get_manufacturer_id get_sensor_id get_product_id (these may need an ack-back from radio module to know it happened) ?get_last_receive_time ?get_last_send_time ?get_next_receive_time ?get_next_send_time incoming_message (OOK or OpenThings as appropriate, stripped of header? pydict?) send_message (a link out to the transport, could be mocked, for example) EnergenieDevice get_radio_config -> config_selector? (freq, modulation) config_parameters? (inner_repeats, delay, outer_repeats) has_switch can_send can_receive LegacyDevice ENER002 turn_on turn_off MiHomeDevice MIHO005 (AdaptorPlus) turn_on turn_off is_on is_off get_switch get_voltage get_freq get_apparent get_reactive get_real MIHO006 (HomeMonitor) get_battery_voltage get_current MIHO012 (eTRV) ?get_battery_voltage ?get_ambient_temperature ?get_pipe_temperature set_setpoint_temperature ?get_valve_position ?is_on ?is_off ?set_valve_position ?turn_on ?turn_off -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESIGN Registry.py file format? platform dependent database format, like dbm but there is a platform dependent one - but need the licence to be MIT so we can just embed it here to have zero dependencies. persist the registry to disk and/or writeback new entries load the registry from disk and/or parse it add a device class instance to the registry with a friendly name - could be from a discovery or learn process - could be from a hand rolled object get a device by name from the registry delete a device from the registry create a new device class instance from a name auto-create variables in a given scope, for all persisted registry entries list the registry in some printable format (like a configuration record) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESIGN - air_interface adaptors for FSK and OOK It looks like we need an air_interface adaptor, that knits the device class parents (LegacyDevice and MiHomeDevice) to the radio. These adaptors will then OpenThings.encode() and OpenThings.decode() so that the address can be consulted in the Registry.Router to route incoming messages to the correct device class. This also then means that TwoBit.encode() must be done in the air_interface adaptors, not in the Device class code. There can be an air_interface adaptor for OOK and FSK, Both will take payloads as pydict or tuple (ha, da, state) and encode/encrypt then configure the radio for the right modulation and send it. For the receive pipeline, a message pump somewhere in the main loop has to put the radio into receive OOK or receive FSK, then when a payload comes in, passes up to the appropriate air_interface. The FSK air_interface adaptor knows to OpenThings.decode before sending to the fsk_router, which then routes to the right device class instance. Similarly, an OOK transmit in the air_interface adaptor knows to TwoBit.encode the tuple (ha, da, s), configure the radio modulation to OOK, pass on any device specific parameters such as inner_repeats, and then transmit the message. When we introduce a message scheduler, it will be at the air_interface layer, and sending and receiving will be deferred on a queue and scheduled, rather than handled immediately. Note: message send and receipt times will have to be relayed to the device classes, either by parameter, or at time of receipt by the class. The scheduler will need to precisely know the receipt time to do accurate scheduling, but the device class probably only needs to know actual receipt time in the class for freshness measurement reasons. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESIGN NOTES - registry data store REQUIREMENT: I want a simple persistent kvp database with the following features: 1. A file format that is portable across all platforms so that a single registry file could be copied from a tutorial onto any machine and it would just work 2. A file format that is human readable and easily editable so that users could create or edit the file just like a config file 3. A simple read and write key/value abstraction in python with a full CRUD lifecycle so that new kvp's can be created, read, updated and deleted. 4. Doesn't have to be hugely efficient or store very large data sets it's mostly used for configuration data that rarely changes, or last known values that tend to be quite small. 5. MIT licence so that it can be just embedded in an existing project 6. A single python file so it is easy to embed 7. Works out of the box with no changes on Python 2 and Python 3 so it doesn't have to be configured or changed and does not limit or dictate a specific python version. Additionally, it might: 8. A option to add multi process locking later if required, but not included by default so that it could be used as a simple central database for multiple programs sharing the same data set. 9. understand read only and read/write intents better when using configuration data and last known values, it is useful to keep them in the same single file, so it is easy to copy to other machines. Some data is naturally 'write once' and very configuration based. Some data is naturally 'write often'. It might be nice if these two types of data could appear in the same file, but the locking/performance and resilience issues be handled differently for the two classes of data - e.g. perhaps having two connections to the same database file, one in read only mode for config records, and one in read/write mode for last use data. There might also be different namespace prefixes in the file so that the key sets are separate, or there may be a way to link them so that when you read a record you get both the static config data and the fast changing last use data as a single record. But this then implies when you do an update, you probably want to update part of a record rather than the whole record. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESIGN NOTES - discovery process a way to sequence transmit messages to allow legacy devices to learn a code. a way to listen (for a long time) for any devices that transmit, and add them (optionally?) to the device registry. a way to listen (in the background) during normal operation for unknown devices, and optionally add them to the device registry. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL NOTES (when configuring the system) print("Press the learn button on the TV device") energenie.start_learn(house_code=0xABCDE, index=2) raw_input("Press enter when done") energenie.stop_learn() energenie.create_device("tv", energenie.device.ENER002, index=2, house_code=0xABCDE) energenie.create_device("aquarium", energenie.device.MIHO005, address=0x1234) (when running the system) tv = energenie.get("tv") aquarium = energenie.get("aquarium") tv.off() aquarium.on() time.sleep(10) if aquarium.power > 20: print("Has the pump motor stalled??") def just_turned_off(device): print("Your user just turned off %s" % device) print("I'm turning it back on!") device.on() aquarium.when_turned_off(just_turned_off) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT STATUS Registry and OpenThings and Devices pretty much implemented now. No Router yet in Registry No Discovery yet in Registry -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TODO NEXT DONE * see if we can rewrite control_both.py using the new device classes (this is tx only with a seeded registry) ---- * write the Router() as a table that routes messages to device class instances in the registry * Think about how the receive poll loop will be pumped, as this creates the need for a receiver Router() that routes incoming messages - probably a Router.loop() that is called by the main app loop (or wrapped in a thread later) * test a synthetic receive route to make sure receive messages can be routed and decoded by different device classes, pump the Router.loop() manually ---- * rewrite the monitor.py to use the new Router * look at starting a thread that pumps the Router.loop() for receive processing, but be careful of threading issues. ---- * look at if we need some when_x_updated() methods on device classes, even just a generic callback that is called when data has been updated. Consider if there are multiple consumers of this data (multiple callback targets) END